Democratic Institutions and Decision-Making in India: Recalibrating Authority, Participation, and Accountability

Main Article Content

Ramesh Malagi
Ajeya A. Abbar

Abstract

Democratic institutions form the backbone of India’s constitutional governance, mediating between the state and citizens through structured decision-making processes. In a diverse and populous democracy, the quality of decisions taken by institutions such as Parliament, the executive, judiciary, and local self-governments directly affects legitimacy, inclusiveness, and public trust. This paper examines the evolving role of democratic institutions in shaping decision-making in India, focusing on their capacity to balance authority with participation and efficiency with accountability. It explores how constitutional design, institutional autonomy, and participatory mechanisms influence governance outcomes, while also addressing contemporary challenges such as centralization of power, policy complexity, and public disengagement. The study highlights the importance of civil society, decentralization, and digital tools in strengthening institutional responsiveness and transparency. By analysing institutional performance across legislative, executive, judicial, and grassroots levels, the paper argues that democratic decision-making must move beyond procedural formalism toward deliberative and inclusive practices. Strengthening democratic institutions requires not only legal safeguards but also an engaged citizenry and ethical political leadership committed to participatory governance.

Article Details

Section

Research Articles

Author Biographies

Ramesh Malagi

Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, SVM Arts, Science and Commerce College, Ilkal.

Ajeya A. Abbar

Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, SK College of Arts, Commerce and Science, Talikoti.

How to Cite

Ramesh Malagi, & Ajeya A. Abbar. (2026). Democratic Institutions and Decision-Making in India: Recalibrating Authority, Participation, and Accountability. ಅಕ್ಷರಸೂರ್ಯ (AKSHARASURYA), 14(03), 122 to 129. https://aksharasurya.com/index.php/latest/article/view/892

References

Arora, B., & Verney, D. (2019). Multiple identities in a single state. Oxford University Press.

Chhibber, P., & Verma, R. (2018). Ideology and identity. Oxford University Press.

Dahl, R. A. (1998). On democracy. Yale University Press.

Dryzek, J. S., et al. (2019). Deliberative democracy in divided societies. Oxford University Press.

Edwards, M. (2014). Civil society. Polity Press.

Fraser, N. (2009). Scales of justice. Columbia University Press.

Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms. MIT Press.

Lijphart, A. (2012). Patterns of democracy. Yale University Press.

Mahajan, G. (2018). Democracy and diversity. Oxford University Press.

Manor, J. (2013). The political economy of democratic decentralization. World Bank.

Mathew, G. (2016). Panchayati Raj in India. Routledge.

Mehta, P. B. (2017). The Indian Supreme Court and democracy. Oxford University Press.

North, D., Wallis, J., & Weingast, B. (2009). Violence and social orders. Cambridge University Press.

OECD. (2020). Innovative citizen participation. OECD Publishing.

Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone. Simon & Schuster.