Chivalry is Patriarchy: Re-reading Medieval Courtesy Through Gendered Power

Main Article Content

Prutha C. Naidu

Abstract

Honestly, Chivalry isn’t really as cool as people like to imagine. People love picturing knights swooping in, to save the day, but the reality - That whole idea just turns women into props. It’s not some grand romance; it actually feels pretty stifling. Women get stuck up on pedestals, treated like they’ll shatter at the first sign of trouble, and expected to keep quiet.
In the Medieval stories such as Sir Gawain and the Green Knight, the woman’s only important because she’s part of the guys’ game. Or take Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales there is the story The Knight’s Tale -women there aren’t even real characters; they’re just rewards, basically handed out to whoever wins. The men dream up a perfect goddess and project whatever traits they want. This is so-called ‘ideal’, total illusion, just something to help keep women boxed in.
Some people try to say chivalry is about respect or caring, but honestly, those arguments fall flat. Chivalry keeps women trapped. There’s not much real respect-it’s mostly rules for men to pat themselves on the back, while women get stuck playing the ‘perfect maiden.’ Any hint of romance gets lost in the show; it’s just guys flexing their masculinity where it feels safe.
Chivalry doesn’t push back against patriarchy. It just covers it up with fancy language. When you really dig into these stories, chivalry isn’t all that noble or pure. It’s a safe way to keep old sexist ideas alive, dressed up in honor and love.

Article Details

Section

Research Articles

Author Biography

Prutha C. Naidu

Assistant Professor, Department of English, GFGC, Ranebennur.

How to Cite

Prutha C. Naidu. (2026). Chivalry is Patriarchy: Re-reading Medieval Courtesy Through Gendered Power. ಅಕ್ಷರಸೂರ್ಯ (AKSHARASURYA), 16(05), 113 to 121. https://aksharasurya.com/index.php/latest/article/view/2206

References

Armitage, Simon, translator. Sir Gawain and the Green Knight. Norton, 2007.

Beauvoir, Simone de. The Second Sex. Translated by Constance Borde and Sheila Malovany-Chevallier, Vintage, 2011.

Bourdieu, Pierre. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge UP, 1977.

Butler, Judith. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. Routledge, 1990.

Chaucer, Geoffrey. The Canterbury Tales. Edited by Larry D. Benson, Houghton Mifflin, 1987.

Chaucer, Geoffrey. Troilus and Criseyde. Edited by Barry Windeatt, Longman, 1984.

Dinshaw, Carolyn. Chaucer’s Sexual Poetics. U of Wisconsin P, 1989.

Elliott, Dyan. Spiritual Marriage: Sexual Abstinence in Medieval Wedlock. Princeton UP, 1993.

Foucault, Michel. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Translated by Alan Sheridan, Vintage, 1995.

Greenblatt, Stephen. Renaissance Self-Fashioning. U of Chicago P, 1980.

Hansen, Elaine Tuttle. Chaucer and the Fictions of Gender. U of California P, 1992.

Malory, Thomas. Le Morte d’Arthur. Edited by Helen Cooper, Oxford UP, 2008.

Mann, Jill. Feminizing Chaucer. D.S. Brewer, 2002.