PEER REVIEW POLICY

Reviewers assist the editorial board in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications during the open review process with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.

Reviewers support the editorial board in making editorial decisions and through the editorial assignment during the double-blind review process which assists the author in improving the manuscript. The editorial board is responsible for confirming the competence of the reviewers.  Contributors will normally receive notification about the acceptance of his/her manuscript for the reviewing process within two weeks and in another two weeks first response from the reviewers. The editorial board is responsible for ensuring the promptness of responses in the double-blind review process. Review should be conducted objectively, and personal criticism of the author should be avoided. The Referee’s report should clearly have arguments in the spirit of enhancing the quality of the manuscript. To Support the review process a review template is also provided.

Maximum 40 days will take for the review process.